A 40-year-old woman presented to our neurology clinic in August 2007 with worsening headaches, which she had been having for several years, and decreased vision. She was legally blind in 1 eye and losing vision in the other eye. Her medical history was notable for IIH, common variable immunodeficiency, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, asthma, obesity (body mass index, 62), hypothyroidism, esophageal reflux, irritable bowel syndrome, nephrolithiasis, sinus tachycardia, osteoporosis, legionnaires' disease, recurrent respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, and sleep apnea. She managed her headaches with topiramate, 25 mg 3 times daily, and with therapeutic lumbar punctures, which she received from her previous neurologist as needed. 

Aside from the worsening headaches and vision, she denied other signs or symptoms such as a change in weight, fevers, chills, night sweats, nausea, vomiting, chest pain, dyspnea, incontinence, or abdominal pain. She did not smoke tobacco or drink alcohol. Her family history revealed her father had psoriasis and died of esophageal cancer, and her mother had osteoarthritis of the hips. 

The patient's medications included topiramate, triamcinolone cream, alclometasone dipropionate ointment, omeprazole, loperamide, alprazolam, methotrexate, etanercept, fluticasone inhaler, tiotropium bromide inhaler, beclometasone inhaler, cetirizine, meloxicam, levothyroxine, tegaserod, folate, verapamil, azelastine nasal spray, levalbuterol, calcitonin, and oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 as needed for back pain. 

Additionally, she had allergies to several medications, including acetazolamide, furosemide, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, sulfonylureas, salicylates, moxi floxacin, azithro mycin, gatifloxacin, codeine, ceftibuten, naproxen, alendronate, erythromycin, and ceftriaxone. 

During physical examination, the patient was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. She was able to follow simple commands, displayed abstract reasoning, and showed no aphasia. The cranial nerve examination showed loss of peripheral vision, bilaterally, with greater deficit in the left eye. The margins of her optic discs were not well defined. The results of the rest of her physical examination were unremarkable. A recent lumbar puncture had an opening pressure of 28 cm H₂0. Findings of magnetic resonance images and magnetic resonance venograms of the brain were unremarkable. 

We discussed the need for a change in treatment because of her vision problems and worsening headaches. Finding an appropriate medication was a challenge because of her allergies to acetazolamide and furosemide. She had been trying to lose weight for years but had also been taking steroids, which can cause weight gain, for her rheumatologic disorders. We presented the options of a CSF shunt or ONSF. However, the patient refused all surgical procedures because of her immunodeficiency, use of immunosuppressants, and problems with recurrent respiratory infections and urinary tract infections. She did not want to put herself at risk of infection or possible failure of a procedure. 

Neblett et al¹² suggested that digoxin can be beneficial to patients with IIH. We discussed this option with the patient and with cardiologists and cardiology staff. The patient agreed to try digoxin. After 6 months of treatment at a dosage of 0.125 mg daily (in tablet form), her headaches disappeared and her vision stabilized. Of note, although the patient was unable to lose weight in the past, her weight decreased from 299 lb to 285 lb in the 6 months after starting digoxin. 

The patient had been headache free for 2 years until she was hospitalized for an unrelated condition in the summer of 2009. During her hospitalization she was unable to take digoxin for 3 days, at which time her headaches came back, necessitating a lumbar puncture. After hospitalization, the patient resumed digoxin at the same dosage but in oral solution form (0.05 mg/mL, 2.5 mL daily). In the past 4 years, she has had 1 flare-up of her IIH, which was mild in comparison to her other flare-ups. Overall, her headaches have almost disappeared and her loss of vision has stabilized. 

There are multiple efficacious treatment options for patients with IIH. However, when a patient presents with a complicated medical history, treatment becomes more challenging. The patient was not benefitting from standard medical therapy, and an intervention was needed to preserve her vision and manage her headaches. Although we could not isolate a cause for the patient's headaches, we believed that nonintervention would adversely affect the patient. 

Few cases of IIH managed with digoxin have been reported, to our knowledge. Digoxin acts on the ouabain-sensitive Na⁺/K⁺ ATPase receptors in the choroid plexus, thereby decreasing CSF production. Neblett et al¹² discussed 3 cases in which the use of digoxin correlated with decreasing CSF production by up to 78%. They concluded that digoxin may be beneficial to conditions of increased CSF pressure. Schott and Holt,¹³ however, used digoxin in a patient with IIH without success. This instance may illustrate that there is more than 1 mechanism for the increased intracranial pressure and perhaps the mechanism in our patient is different from the mechanism in the patient noted by Schott and Holt.¹³ Borsody et al¹⁴ noted that levels of brain ouabain-like compounds, which inhibit the Na⁺/K⁺ ATPase receptors, were lower in patients with unsuccessfully managed IIH. Digoxin is similar to ouabain-like compounds, which could explain our patient's improvement. 

The patient lost 14 lb in the first 6 months of treatment, a result that correlates with that of Hannerz,⁶ who found that treatment with digoxin caused weight loss and a decrease in CSF pressure in obese patients. Although our patient continued to lose weight (78 lb during the course of 4 years), she also experienced some gastrointestinal motility problems during the same time span. Therefore, it cannot be said whether digoxin is responsible for the patient's weight loss. 

In patients with IIH and complicated medical conditions, physicians should consider digoxin. Even though the mechanism of action is not well understood, it clearly has benefits in this group of patients.