As I noted in previous articles,
1,8 I have successfully implemented and confirmed the use of OMT to treat patients with TOS and to alleviate symptoms that correlate with resolution of abnormalities found by means of thermography.
1,8 Although thermography is no longer used as a diagnostic tool in most medical facilities, especially for disorders such as TOS, neuromuscular US imaging has recently gained acceptance as a diagnostic method for nerve compression syndromes.
9-13 In addition, I have combined neuromuscular US with dynamic stress testing to assist in the diagnosis of TOS (B.M.S., unpublished data, 2011).
Furthermore, I previously performed limb manipulation during cadaver dissection of the thoracic outlet and observed that when the arm is abducted, external rotation causes the brachial plexus to contact the posterior edge of the PMM.
6 Arm rotation internally causes the plexus to “drop away” from the PMM, thus allowing vigorous manipulation of the muscle without irritating the neurovascular structures.
6 The usual position for most overhead activity (such as grooming) is achieved with external rotation, which puts the plexus at risk for irritation or impingement by the PMM. Close-up views of anatomy dissections confirm the proximity relationship of the brachial plexus and PMM and reveal mild “indentation” at even 90° of abduction.
6(p797) Regrettably, medical history regarding possible TOS symptoms on the cadaver is unavailable, and feedback for symptom provocation during stress maneuvers requires a living specimen.
I obtained digital video recordings for some patients with TOS and demonstrated that the brachial plexus (and axillary artery) appears to press into and indent the posterior edge of the PMM during arm abduction. Unfortunately, it can be challenging (and time consuming) to create a real-time dynamic recording because increasing abduction causes the anterior axillary fold to “push” the US transducer off the area of interest and the image is easily lost. Thus, video recordings are not routinely obtained during the typical neuromuscular US examination protocol.
For the present case, however, video capture of the manipulation was obtained, and it confirmed that the manipulating hand (finger) was in contact with the PMM, which was the primary anatomic structure of interest (
http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/111/9/543/DC1). It can be noted that the manipulating finger creates marked anterior deformation of the PMM, which verifies that firm pressure is being applied focally. I have previously discussed this type of direct pressure as a required component of successful OMT for patients with TOS—the pressure “releases or ‘frees up’ focal myofascial adhesions/restrictions, and ‘guides’ the myofascial unit back into more proper alignment and function.”
8
I have also previously discussed the pathologic mechanics in TOS,
1,8 a key element of which involves the theory of progressive PMM shortening. Alterations of posture caused by tightening of the PMM lead to scapular protraction, forward “collapse” of the shoulder girdle, and relative closure of the thoracic outlet.
1,14 Entrapment of the neurovascular bundle then leads to upper limb symptoms because these structures are stretched as they “hook” underneath the PMM just inferior to the coracoid attachment site.
1 As noted by Simons et al, “stretch and torsion of the brachial plexus and axillary artery can occur as they hook beneath the pectoralis minor muscle where it attaches to the coracoid process.”
14(p850) The illustration they provide demonstrates the neurovascular bundle indenting the PMM from below (posterior) in the abducted arm position, resulting in nerve entrapment.
14(p850)
Simons et al
14 described how both the medial and lateral cords can be impinged or compressed either together, causing symptoms in the entire hand, or separately, resulting in only medial or lateral hand symptoms. I have also illustrated indentation of the PMM by the neurovascular bundle pulling against the posterior muscular edge during arm abduction and resulting in nerve entrapment.
4
Imaging changes noted in the PMM during stress testing can be explained by deformation created from stretching force as the neurovascular bundle is pulled against the posterior edge of the muscle during arm abduction. Because the PMM is shortened in patients with TOS, there is no laxity to allow the motion without some indentation from the pressure of the neurovascular bundle impinging against the muscle. Neuromuscular US reveals an upward (anterior) bowing of the center of the PMM while the sides appear to angle downward (posterior), especially on the left side (proximal or superior) near the coracoid attachment (
Figure 1B and
Figure 1C).
The amount of bowing can be objectively measured as a pectoral bowing ratio (B.M.S., unpublished data, 2011), which is typically greater in patients with TOS (more than 10%) than in healthy individuals (less than 10%). This effect is similar to the palmar bowing ratio of the flexor retinaculum measured with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, who have been shown to be have palmar bowing ratios greater than 10% compared with ratios less than 10% in healthy controls.
7 The palmar bowing ratio of the flexor retinaculum was considered a useful parameter that correlated significantly with symptoms in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, and it appeared related to enlargement of structures within the carpal tunnel that caused the retinaculum to be “pushed in a volar direction.”
7(p1104) In TOS, the bowing is like a sling under the PMM that creates a pulley effect from the neurovascular bundle that is tethered at each end, and the resultant force against the PMM causes the brachial plexus to deform or “flatten” as the bowing increases (
Figure 1B and
Figure 1C, lateral cord). This tethering effect has also been demonstrated—but not objectively measured—in previous publications.
4(p473),6(p797)
An understanding of the pathomechanics that contribute to development of TOS can be applied to treatment. In patients or individuals without TOS, the plexus simply “glides” under the PMM, avoiding impingement or indentation of the muscle. This observation supports the nerve gliding techniques of Totten and Hunter,
15 who restored normal posture and mobility of the brachial plexus in patients with TOS as a method of alleviating symptoms. Case studies have demonstrated that OMT applied to the thoracic outlet can improve posture, relieve symptoms, and resolve thermographic abnormalities.
1,8,16 A vital OMT technique for management of TOS is myofascial release of the PMM, which can restore the scapula to its normal position.
8,16 These prior studies
1,8,16 were not able to include neuromuscular US of the thoracic outlet to monitor changes in the neurovascular bundle and PMM before and after treatment.
Supplemental treatment of patients with TOS with stretching exercise for the PMM can improve results but is difficult because the PMM is a deep muscle and there is no simple method to separate the origin from the insertion.
14 I developed a method that involves hanging by the arm,
8 but not all patients can tolerate full abduction and partial body weight distraction on the shoulder joint simultaneously. In addition, simply separating the ends of the muscle does not ensure that the trigger points will release because the muscle fibers on either side of the trigger point may elongate as the trigger itself remains unchanged.
8 Therefore, use of myofascial release applied directly to the PMM is a rapidly effective method to achieve lengthening and release. Unlike longitudinal stretch, application of vigorous direct force is perpendicular to the muscle fibers, and a “back and forth stripping” maneuver essentially “milks” out focal restrictions in the triggers, as shown in the video recording (
http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/111/9/543/DC1).