Original Contribution  |   March 2018
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Sacral Base Asymmetry
Author Notes
  • From the Department of Family Medicine, Preventive Medicine, and Community Health at the A.T. Still University Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine (ATSU-KCOM) in Missouri (Drs Snider and Kondrashova); the Northeast Missouri Health Council in Kirksville (Dr Redman); the Northeast Regional Medical Center in Kirksville, Missouri (Dr Edwards); and Research Support at ATSU in Kirksville, Missouri (Ms Bhatia). Dr Edwards is a third-year resident. 
  • Financial Disclosures: None reported. 
  • Support: This study was supported by a grant from ATSU's Warner/Fermaturo Research Fund. 
  •  *Address correspondence to Karen T. Snider, DO, Department of Family Medicine, Preventive Medicine, and Community Health, ATSU-KCOM, 800 W Jefferson St, Kirksville, MO 63501-1143. Email: ksnider@atsu.edu
     
Article Information
Imaging / Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders / Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment / Pediatrics / Psychiatry
Original Contribution   |   March 2018
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Sacral Base Asymmetry
The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, March 2018, Vol. 118, 159-169. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2018.035
The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, March 2018, Vol. 118, 159-169. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2018.035
Web of Science® Times Cited: 1
Abstract

Context: Patients with low back pain (LBP) may receive osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to resolve or manage their pain. The indication for OMT for patients with LBP is the presence of somatic dysfunction, diagnosed using palpatory examination. Because palpatory findings commonly have poor interexaminer reliability, the current study used ultrasonography (US) to establish pre-OMT and post-OMT musculoskeletal measurements of relative asymmetry between pelvic and sacral bony landmarks.

Objective: To document objective musculoskeletal changes that occur in response to OMT using US and to compare palpatory assessment of landmark asymmetry with US assessment.

Methods: Sixty men and women aged 20 to 55 years with at least 1 episode of LBP in the past 2 weeks were assigned to a seated control, walking control, or OMT group (20 participants per group). Participants received an initial, bilateral US measurement of the skin to posterior superior iliac spine (SPSIS), skin to sacral base position (SBP), and sacral sulcus depth (SSD). Participants in seated control and OMT groups received a palpatory assessment of SBP and SSD prior to initial US assessment. After assessment, the seated control group sat in a waiting room for 30 minutes, the walking control group walked for 5 minutes, and the OMT group received OMT to address sacral base asymmetry using predominantly direct techniques for a maximum of 20 minutes. Participants then received a second US assessment of the same structures.

Results: Body mass index (BMI) was correlated with SPSIS (r=0.5, P=.001) and SBP (r=0.6, P<.001). More participants in seated control (75%) and OMT (65%) groups had an increase in asymmetry from first to second US assessment for SPSIS compared with participants in the walking control group (35%, P=.05). No significant differences were found between groups for absolute asymmetry or total change in asymmetry (all P>.10). The κ was −0.1 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.03) for SBP and −0.01 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.1) for SSD.

Conclusion: Musculoskeletal changes in SPSIS and SBP measurements related to OMT could not be readily identified using US. The SPSIS and SBP measurements were dependent on BMI, which may have affected the accuracy of US to detect small changes in asymmetry. Qualitative palpatory assessments did not correlate with US measurements. Further study is needed to identify US measurements that demonstrate change with OMT. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02820701)

Subscribe to view more

For full access to this article, log in to an existing user account, purchase an annual subscription, or purchase a short-term subscription.

Order a subscription

Subscribe

Pay Per View

Entire Journal
30-Day Access

$30.00

Buy Now

This Issue
7-Day Access

$15.00

Buy Now

This article
24-Hour Access

$5.00

Buy Now

Sign In Or Create an account

Please sign in using your Osteopathic.org login.
If you do not have an AOA login, you may create a new account.

Or Subscribe